Which method is NOT a step to identify specific skill deficits in math?

Study for the TExES Special Education EC–12 (161) Test. Engage with flashcards and multiple choice questions for each section, featuring hints and explanations to guide you. Prepare effectively for your teaching certification exam and excel in your career!

The method that is not a step to identify specific skill deficits in math is relying solely on student self-assessment. While self-assessment can provide valuable insights into a student’s perspective on their understanding and skills, it typically lacks the objectivity and comprehensive analysis required to pinpoint specific areas of difficulty.

Self-assessment may lead to biases, as students might overestimate or underestimate their grasp of concepts. For a thorough evaluation of skill deficits, corroborative evidence from standardized assessments, teacher observations, and a careful examination of student work is essential. These methods provide a more balanced approach, ensuring that various aspects of a student's mathematical abilities are assessed through different lenses, leading to a more accurate identification of any gaps in understanding and skills.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy